A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
我的queen B ，love u always
她们的身体素质都好厉害，下雪天一件运动背心一件抓绒服一件登山服。
#跟着网飞看电影系列 非常老套的你的闺蜜跟的丈夫搞在一起，闺蜜觉得对不起你要分手约你旅行准备摊牌，丈夫飞来杀了闺蜜。你还以为闺蜜失踪报案追踪，中间被误以为凶手的警察意外死亡结案，最终在丈夫外套发现闺蜜死前带着你送的项链上一颗珠子，over。
翻拍自墨西哥的《我们是贵族》，可惜劳资法兰西的幽默与热情并没能抚平作品的先天不足，故事从头到尾还是那回事儿，哪怕热拉尔·朱尼奥在《放牛班的春天》里能挽救一个班的熊孩子，在这里也没可能领电影更优秀一些……
一颗星给救人与自救的大主旋律，两颗星给无限旖旎的山谷风光。冰风暴刮得清醒 生疼 沧桑，女主在这种环境下毫发未损，还依靠主角光环将一个废男拖下山，厉害。雪景比人更耀眼，可以截屏好～多张桌面。
IG看到Queen B宣傳就來看一下 克羅地亞蠻美的 司機原來是好人 房東和老公都好弱啊被女主直接摔下地
有两个故弄玄虚的漏洞：1.女人一般说男人会说混蛋，而不是贱人
phl->lax #1
多一星給風景，好想住在那，爬完雪山回家洗個熱水澡一杯熱拿鐵一根薄荷煙
当然，只看风景的话，那一颗星还值得保留的。
剧本欠打磨啊，来回怀疑一圈人。司机角色驱动力和出现都莫名其妙。然后就是全世界的恶都是前夫渣男干得^^
最多算个罪案片，奈何剧情简单的仿佛小学生写的，一共就几个主要角色，凶手明显的就差写脑门上了，作案动机无趣至极，还隔这写丈夫和闺蜜出轨的桥段，有够老土的
看简介是我喜欢的狗血搞笑剧，看完后很失望。就是这个题材怎么也能拍的这么无聊，最精华的有钱仔体会普通打工人民生活的部分草草带过了。最后也没懂得感恩。也没啥成长。搞笑也没搞笑到。。
phl->lax #1
无聊消遣……不过做爸爸也太难了……女主五星……
确实慢，但确实写实。一般这类电影都拍得特别有故事性。但真实往往就是这个电影拍的这样平淡却伟大。
随便看看 好多情节太牵强了 最后跟rob对峙的时候 自己就叭儿叭儿的开始说你是凶手！颤抖吧？？？开什么玩笑… 前面还确实曾一度怀疑到底谁是真凶 可以相信谁 越到后面越不过脑子
...
你豆无耻有个限度！我自己看电影自己写读后感做个记录，你删你马的删！怎么？电影观后感还要去主观化？不能贬低吊子是吧？你全身是烂JJ吧？整个电影前20分钟还好，后面无不充斥着南拳社会对女性的压迫羞辱不信任贬低讽刺利用，甚至是随时随地异想天开的dang妇羞辱。伴随着多个男性对女主无耻的欺骗！然而这世界就是相信壮硕如牛的男性不会有龌龊的小人之心。更不会去倾听和相信一个无助的女性哭红了眼拼命求助！D品、放荡、乱来、盗窃、甚至你被你老公出轨闺蜜都是你的错！全盘否认你的证词甚至忽视不记录你的报告。结果是什么，下毒的陪酒烂掉子、勾引不成恼羞成怒的蝻Jc、求而不得的出轨老公痛下S手～还眼睁睁看着闺蜜痛苦窒息挣扎。就这电影的全部，特别露骨。分那么低我是不理解！姑娘们独立自信！带着包容看世界，带着防备聪明生活。
感觉剧本只有大纲 没有任何细节设计 后面追逐对决的部分像小鬼当家
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
