Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
全片无惊喜，千篇一律的套路。都陷到地下了，女生的红唇妆容仍然精致，男人们还能对坐着喝酒释怀，在地上等待的妈妈们也能有沉下心来的时刻，隔壁楼的居民竟然都不担心自己会有生命威胁还不同意政府的营救，也是没谁了。而且地下500米的环境，除了阴暗一点，跟地上竟然没区别（我一个文科生都能感觉出反科学了）……冲着光洙看的，可能是因为看他的综艺太久了吧，他一出现我就容易出戏，也没有给我《特级兄弟》带来的惊喜（还是角色契合吧）。1.25倍速看完，仅一星不能多给了……
也就这样 搞笑和灾难一起搞 不伦不类 三个星 送给光洙吧
也没那么难看，开头那些小细节拍的还是不错的
男主太下头了，不帅的人耍酷，让人厌恶……还有女主为什么总是打破第四面墙呢，表现了她的演技不足，还是要表现他异于常人的聪明……
优点是选角挺养眼，私设并不全让人排斥，有些有趣有些搞笑。但把安妮这个角色打碎重构，完全失去了故事原有的魅力。看完也不太确定看了个啥，反正不是劝导😅
纵然有些缺陷，但也不失为一部算是新颖的改编。
所以如果男主没混出名堂，他俩就再也不会复合了。所以这部片子的劝导是：年轻人要努力奋斗啊！！！
这部电影拍得真是不错，托斯卡纳的美景，米其林星级厨师的佳肴，感觉像是在欣赏一幅油画！难得的佳片！
在这种情况下能如此自救就够厉害，几个演员轻松搞笑也度过了不错的两小时，更何况是在影院包场。
嗯 打破第四堵墙是很能表现女主狡黠的一个方式，但！时不时就wink一个是不是有点子缺啊，以及男主为啥感觉智商不高的样子？？？？
平庸之作，其实就是讲丹麦厨师的寂寞，空虚，冷。
毫无逻辑可言，但是看得还挺欢乐的，就当无厘头搞笑灾难片看了
达妹的街拍造型穿越来电影既视感，以及毫无chemistry的男女主角，绝对不是我心中的劝导，却连改编都乏善可陈
打破第四面墙的叙述方式让我很不适应，女主的口吻过于现代化，让我觉得有点不伦不类，男主的脸又一度让我觉得他大概不是男主。
感觉无论那个版本都没改好女主在小说里那种韧性，感觉都在为理想生活奋斗那种主旋律田园风，男一号能不能换个人啊跟达妹完全不搭.........结尾曲声线果然是Birdy~
不称职的旅行，不愉快的食物，不讨好的爱情。
美景不断，作为厨师对卫生干净的要求，自己上手哇，匠心。一份三明治也能做出大菜的感觉哈哈哈哈。爱情难道不能好好想想吗？结一次乌龙婚？伤害就是三个人呀。结婚冷静期、缓冲期。
剧情有点莫名其妙，但希望今年可以去意大利玩嘿嘿
👩：这是一个有点俗气的三分爱情故事。
编剧不觉得深沉克制的爱永远与现代思潮格格不入吗
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
